Posted by: carboncreditsusa | December 24, 2008

Outgoing Environment Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Johnson States That EPA Cannot Impose Limits On Greenhouse Gas Emissions Creating Roadblocks For Obama Adminstration Climate Change Options

epaAdministrator Johnson stated that air permits issued under the Clean Air Act cannot require limits on greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, since there are currently no regulations on greenhouse gases.  Although ultimately the matter is one of statutory interpretation, legally speaking, the EPA probably got it right.

“…the definition of “regulated NSR pollutant” in 40 C.F.R. § 52.21(b)(50) to exclude pollutants for which EPA regulations only require monitoring or reporting but to include each pollutant subject to either a provision in the Clean Air Act or regulation promulgated by EPA under the Clean Air Act that requires actual control of emissions of that pollutant. . . This interpretation is supported by the language and structure of the regulation and sound policy considerations…”

http://taberlaw.wordpress.com/2008/12/21/epa-speeds-up-approval-of-coal-plants-while-court-strikes-rule-that-allows-plants-to-exceed-limits/

On Thursday, December 18, 2008, out-going EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson issued a memorandum setting an agency-wide policy prohibiting controls on carbon dioxide emissions from being included in air permits coal-fired power plants and other facilities.  In essence, this memorandum overturns the Environmental Appeals Board finding in In re Deseret Power Electric Cooperative. In that matter the EAB remanded an appeal of a permitting decision back to the Region, because the permitting record failed to set forth “sufficiently clear and consistent articulations of an Agency interpretation to constrain the authority.” In laymen’s terms, what this meant was that Region 8 could include limits on greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide, in a Clean Air Act permit.

Administrator Johnson stated that air permits issued under the Clean Air Act cannot require limits on greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, since there are currently no regulations on greenhouse gases.  Although ultimately the matter is one of statutory interpretation, legally speaking, the EPA probably got it right.

The EAB based its decision on the fact that there was not a clear EPA interpretation of the scope of the phrase “subject to regulation” used in the regulatory definition of the term “regulated NSR pollutant,” 40 C.F.R. 52.21(b)(50), and §§ 165 and 169 of the Clean Air Act. The Sierra Club had argued in Deseret that the scope of “subject to regulation” encompassed pollutants which are monitored and reported, but for which there are no EPA limits. The EAB concluded that the phrase was ambiguous and, in light of the lack of EPA interpretation, the Region could issue a Clean Air Act permit that contained limits on carbon dioxide.

The Administrator found that the principle of ejusdem generis applied in interpreting the statute and regulation leading him to conclude:

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: